Jay absolutly no reason for you to take that as insult... if you did I apolgize because it was simple discussion. Your statement about making dogs hate something and comparing a dog to a woman is not unusual.... its where most folks get hung up, they love their dogs (who doesn't) and sometimes forget they're thought processes are much purer and simpler than ours. They are dogs and think like such. We are people and think like such. Without the benefit of vocabulary to communicate its as easy to get the wrong message across as the right. Espeically if you start with only a partial understanding or worst a prediogus against something. We have the benefit of vocabulary, and usually 98% of the time see eye to eye, and you got offended by what i said... heck that shows how easy communication can go awry. You wont belive how many people follow a step in a book because its the next step in the book.. without ever wondering why its done a certain way. Think like a dog and you can overcome most any obstcal, with formal training steps or not. Pinch my ear to make my fat azz eat a steak, i wont love a steak anymore than i do... I know Im different than a dog. dogs are happy to be obedient... they are happy to have a pack leader and follow in... if people where like dogs life would be easier! ha.
If your dog holds a bird perfectly, and suits your needs and standards without ff, then you don't. I told you I wasn't trying to sell anyone on it. But i was trying to explain what it does... that was the discussion. What if your dog suddenly doesn't hold a bird? What if you dog doesn't go when sent? What if your dog balks at a bird? What if you have a problem, now your back to where the OP is... might take a day, might take a week, might take a month... instead if properly ff'd those things would not have happened, and if they did, its one command or 2 commands and a correction and your on with your day.
But hold can be done without force. Its done all the time. The entire process of ff, teaches a dog to have an obligation to retreive (hence where we're different, the point I didnt make but was trying too). I don't think you can make me have an obligation to eat pie... I love pie. I dont think anything can make me have an obligation to it. With the obligation and fetch as a reflex action, the dogs doesn't think (even if for a nano second and complies thinking before a comman isn't obligation) he simply does. Further training teaches dogs to think when they need too, and to simply do when told... its the reason the same dog can watch mutiple birds go down, remember where they are at, put on an intilligent hunt to retreive them, and then line up and run 300 yards straight fighting the wind and angles, and levees, and dtiches and come up with a bird he didnt see.... it all starts by the obligation and reflex action, and condtioning to hunt and think when its apporiate. A properly ff'd dog doesn't switch falls... or switch birds.. he has been condtioning to start the retreive he was directed on and finish that retreive. A properly ff'd dog learns how to deal with pressure, to work thru it, and not shut down when presure is needed. its the foundation for a solid blind running dog. can a dog be taught to run blinds without it... yup. I just did a tune up on a older lab that had 15 months of brit style training from a pro a couple years ago. She ran blinds... she basically hunted the direction she was sent. Good enough for a test or trial? Heck naw. But a meat dog... a meat dog thats fine until theres more than one bird down... because she went and got one, and wouldnt handle away from it. And if she got confused, she just wouldnt go. Without any background to draw upon, I spent more time on her trying to get her to run a set of simple 100 yard blinds on land, than a dog that hadn't even run his first taught blind... and in a month, the young dog with basics was kicking her butt. Doesnt mean shes not a good dog, cause she is, she was cool and i really loved her and her personailty. But her owner, never had been around trained dogs before, had his eyes opened. He loves his dog, and i told him ahead of time it wasnt a fair comparison, but he'll be buying a fully trained, ff'd, and cc'd dog next time. shes better than shes ever been, but with solid basics, in the time and money spent on her, she cudda done amazing things. he too had the common misconcpetion about trial dogs being wild out of control robots that lacked the sense to actually hunt.. until he saw my 13 year old son run 5 dogs off my truck that swung with the gun barrel, looked where you looked, and ignored the old falls and ran straight lines as far the field went.... Everybody doesnt need a dog like that, nor are they going to spend the time money energy and effort to have one like that... but to think those dogs are anything but loved animals with ENORMUS amounts of time spent on them is wrong. And save for one very special dog i can remember, ive never seen one like that wasn't ff'd. No matter how much they love going to get a bird, the bringing it back part and everything else is something we teach them... why not use the cleanest clearest methods to teach that, and spend the time advancing your dog, or crappie fishing, or whatever else you want, than patching holes? Jay you spend a ton of time with your dogs... and get the results you want. Thats awesome. but you also hunt a lot more and get a lot more on the job training than 95% of the people on the board do... dogs only live so long.
As far as the water and a duck tossed... cold water now might just make another problem. If it was warm, then water and another dog would be the quickest way out of it. But dog gets in cold water, and decides to not get duck, it aint getting back into cold water again. hunting is one thing, but I dont even run water blinds with my dogs until the water gets 55 degrees or so... dogs no matter how much they love the water, are land animals and anything involing a possible fubar and water should be avoided. travis