Eric:
Thanks for the note. I thought very hard about whether or not the increase in displacement would offset the shift in weight to the rear of the boat. I should have paid more attention in physics as your numbers provide clarity...some thoughts:
Kevin
Thanks for the note. I thought very hard about whether or not the increase in displacement would offset the shift in weight to the rear of the boat. I should have paid more attention in physics as your numbers provide clarity...some thoughts:
- Specs put the motor at 105 lbs (the 30hp Mariner is light for its displacement)
- At rest, you're right about the amount of displaced hull below the water line. This is minimized by the (small) amount of rocker aft, so I don't think it would completely equalize torque. I'm guessing it's maybe 1.0 to 1.5 cubic feet of displacement below waterline. Placing the fuel tank (6 gal), battery and gear forward helps.
- On plane, I wonder how it works out as the increase in hull surface is right where it makes the most difference. Not smart enough to do the math.
- In the end it's all moot, because the operator is, as Chris put it, a "man of substance" and I sit on the rear deck. I never thought about my size in terms of foot pounds. Good grief.
Kevin