For the VT guys, zone boundary changes for 2011

Hank Fish

Active member
From Bill Crenshaw and going to the F&W board. There is a map also, but I can not get it to post......

Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department
Waterfowl Zone Boundary Change - 2011

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for state waterfowl zone boundaries are regulated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and published annually in the Federal Register. Under current guidelines, Vermont is allowed three zones (Lake Champlain Zone, Vermont Interior Zone and Connecticut River Zone), and a 60-day season with one split (two segments) for each zone. Every five years states are allowed to propose minor changes in zone boundaries. This year (2011) is one of those years (the next opportunity will be 2016). States considering zone boundary changes must notify the USFWS of their intentions by May 1, 2011.


PROPOSED REGULATION - CHANGE (or NEW): Change the boundary between the Lake Champlain and Vermont Interior Zones to remove the Missisquoi Delta in the town of Swanton (and the Mud Creek Controlled Hunting Area in the town of Alburgh) from the Lake Champlain Zone and add this area to the Vermont Interior Zone.
The current description of the Lake Champlain Zone would change from “….U.S. 7 to the Canadian border.” , to “ … U.S. 7 to VT 78 at Swanton; VT 78 to VT 36; VT 36 to Maquam Bay on Lake Champlain; along and around the shoreline of Maquam Bay and Hogg Island to VT 78 at the West Swanton Bridge; VT 78 to VT 2 in Alburgh; VT 2 to the Richelieu River; along the east shore of the Richelieu River to the Canadian border.”


EXPLANATION:*The Missisquoi Delta is one of the most heavily hunted waterfowl areas in the state. The shallow marshes encompassing most of the bay (including all of the Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge) typically freeze by late November. The Lake Champlain Zone hunting season usually has a short segment in early October, followed by a split of one to two weeks, with the second segment reopening in late October, and continuing through mid-December. The purpose of this season structure is to provide opportunity for late season hunting for diving ducks (e.g., common goldeneyes) on Lake Champlain. By contrast, the Vermont Interior Zone usually opens in early October and runs straight until the first week in December. Missisquoi Delta hunters lose ice-free hunting days during the October split which they cannot recover in December because of frozen marshes and lack of ducks. The Missisquoi Delta has more in common with the Vermont Interior Zone than it does with the Lake Champlain Zone.
The proposed regulation would result in Missisquoi Delta waterfowl hunters having more opportunity to hunt during October when the marshes are open and ducks available. The Mud Creek Controlled Hunting Area is similar to the Missisquoi Delta and can be easily included in the new boundary change.


PROPOSED TIMING AND OUTREACH: The first Vermont Fish and Wildlife Board vote will take place on February 16, 2011, with a second vote in March and final vote in April. The issue of changing the waterfowl zone boundaries has been discussed at public waterfowl meetings held annually in August for the past five years. Over this period, there has been growing support for this change expressed by both Missisquoi Delta and late season hunters alike. A public meeting to give hunters one more opportunity to discuss and share views will be scheduled at the earliest date allowed by the rule making process, probably early April. The USFWS will be notified by the Department of the proposed regulation change by May 1.
 
Thanks for the heads up. I'm always planning on heading over across the lake but never get to it.
I see so many VT plates over here I figure why bother. VT does have some nice habitat though.....
Thanks again-
-
 
Hank,

Thanks for the info. I had heard about the possibility of changes, but I wasn't sure if it was just rumor. I Don't hunt Missisiquoi much because of the crowds. However, I do hunt the area for Goldeneyes late season and would be interested to see a detailed map of the area that would be encompassed in the new zone. It seems to be a good idea, but the devil is in the details. Do you have any thoughts?
 
Cheech, here is the best I can do with the map that was in with the release. I could not get it to cut and paste into my picture folder.........but you will get the idea.

I personally like the idea as I believe Missisquoi is more like the interior than the lake zone. I have not hunted there in years as we are down south, so the "regulars" may have something different to say.



IMG_1995.jpg



H
 
While this would be nice for the guys who favor early season hunting, it does those of us who prefer late season hunting no favors. I'd almost be in favor of it IF they only included Missisquoi and didn't include any part of Alburg.

I could also see where it would keep birds from hunkering down in Missisquoi in the early part of the season. Hank, any idea if the Maquam shore boundry is right at the water's edge, or out from shore aways?

John Bourbon
 
Hank,

Thanks for the info and the Map. I was wondering if you could post the link to the news release? I like to think I'm reading the map correctly, and I am not liking what I see. I, like John and often with John, hunt those areas for late season divers and if they decide to change the zone we will be done hunting that area by first week of December.
 
John, not sure on the answer for you, I guess Bill would be the one to ask.

Cheech, I got the e-mail from a friend who is on the F&W board here in Rutland, so I don't have a "link" to it. I did forward it to your e-mail.
 
I was hoping the boundary would split the refuge up the river this new line is dumb. Above the west swanton bridge dosent freeze like goose gander and willow bays do, theres no reason to include that part of Alburgh.

eddie
 
Last edited:
Eddie,

I agree. Seems as if they are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. If they want to include Mud creek, they should, but not everywhere north of 78.
 
Guys I just sent the attached Email to Bill C.

"Bill I was sent the attached link for the proposed new interior zone and what is on the WEB doesn’t look like anything that was discussed in the public forums. The conversation have been to make north of the bridge part of the interior.

If what is out there for info is correct it would be really counterproductive to shut down all of Tabor point and Maquam Bay to shore hunting since these are some of the few areas that stay open late. Just a thought but why not use RT 78 as the border not RT 36 ? This would keep the Hog Island and Maquam in the Lake zone where they should be and leave the marshes in the interior. I would also suggest RT 78 to RT 2 and then RT 2 to 225. If Patrick Marsh is a concern and it being in the interior zone at least use Tabor Point Rd. and the high water mark along Maquam bay this would still keep all of the lake that stays open in the lake zone.

Bill just my two cents but the MAP that is on this web site http://duckboats.net/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=150428;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;forum_view=forum_view_collapsed;;page=unread#unread is going to give folks some heart burn. Thanks"


I would say please reach out to Bill if you have concerns. I certainly do.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top