jode hillman said:I have it straight from the NJ enforcement's mouth, they are counting it as whatever it resembles more. It better look a lot like a Mallard or your going to get written. I could expound at length the speculum and feather characteristics of a hybrid, but long story short is the wardens don't want to hear that.
Mallard drake
Will M said:Bird on the right
Brad Bortner said:Tod
Not sure if you’re busting my chops or not. The Federal decision has always been that it counts as the least restrictive limit. But it comes down to ID by the CO. But black/mallard hybrids are counted as mallards in the bag under Federal regulations.
tod osier said:Brad Bortner said:Tod
. . . . Blah Blah Blah Blah . . . . . (Snipped for brevity) []
When you have a category of lower limit birds (hen mallards, mallards) that apparent blacks can become once they are determined as hybrids that leads to an issue. This is especially true when the main pool of ducks to shoot many days includes only mallards, blacks and hybrids. Having no consensus and official statement limits my enjoyment and puts me at risk on the rare days that I'm in that position.
Just be glad that position is rare for you. Common here any time I hunt on the salt in southern Maine, which may be why Maine warden's take a fairly liberal view and count blacks ducks as "other duck" rather than mallard or hen mallard. I was not aware this conflicts with the Federal interpretation, but have never seen a federal warden up here even when I hunt on NWR lands. If Maine wardens were writing tickets to someone who had 4 mallards in the bag and shot a "black duck" that turned out to be a hybrid, that would be a pretty common offense.