If this guy gets in

the only "logically" arrived at answer as to WHO to vote for.........forget who hates us, forget all that "who shot John" crap, forget blaming "past" and "present" Presidents, (or any other Politician for that matter)....forget History.....forget the future.....the answer is plain and simple if you'll only just look at the candidates themselves....

CANDATE ONE:

a bitch who is a lawyer, married to a lawyer.

CANDIDATE TWO:

a lawyer who is married to a bitch who is a lawyer.

CANDIDATE THREE:

a Military Veteran and "War Hero" married to a woman with a
huge chest who owns a beer distributorship.


So I ask you....WHERE is the contest here?

Over and out....

Steve
 
Charlie, it is NOT a fact that we torture prisoners. Torture is an arbitrary concept. Yes, we have intimidated prisoners with vicious dogs, paraded them naked, and made then "think" that they were drowning (waterboarding). Those certainly not fun or enjoyable things but I would not classify them as torture. Torture is when you do things like starving, electrocuting, bamboo shoots under fingernails, whipping, beating, etc. When I was in a fraternity, I had to tie a string to a brick and then to my unit, get blindfolded, and then throw the brick (the string had been cut but I couldn't see that). I had to play blackjack with the deck stacked against me with my naked *ss sitting in a pot of HOT salsa. If today's media got ahold of that, they'd cry that I was tortured. When we start cutting off ears and fingers and mailing it to their families then I'll join your side. Until then, we need to realize that war is hell and that we need to leave it to the professionals instead of letting a bunch of Hugo Chavez commie lovers like Cindy Sheehan dictate our policy.

Along those same lines, in the old days people sentenced to death were killed by firing squads, hangings, and guillotines. Later, those methods were found to be cruel so we went to lethal injections. Now, those methods are being called cruel and unusual. What's next, are we going to say that its cruel and unual to leave people on death row for their whole life and release them? It's time that we grew up and understood that the world is more that roses and lolipops.
 
"....that is the centrist, realist point of view held by the vast majority of Americans".

Where? In Vermont? New Hampshire? Iowa? Sorry, that is a "falsehood".

"It is okay to make mistakes, but the idea is to learn from them. We ought to learn form the mistake of invading Iraq, and grow from it, not hide behind it and continue to justify it."

We certainly have made mistakes and we ARE growing from it....unfortunately that is the way of war. We are NOT hiding behind anything other than just about EVERYBODY in our government condoned it including Gore, Hillary, Pelosi, Reid etc and now we have a mess to deal with(IT'S CALLED WAR!). We are justifying it because people like you want to lose and withdraw and therefore we must continue to make positive points of justification which is very difficult when folks like yourself feed at the trough of lies everyday(hint hint, that ain't centrist thinking).

"Yes, we do torture. It is not debatable. Our president and his lawyers authorized it, and we stand by and condone it. If you don't believe that, you are sadly mistaken. What may be a point of debate is whether it is okay to torture people. I say no it isn't, but others think it is okay (the ends justify the means). "

I didn't say we don't torture..I am referring to the "falsehood" you belched out when you compared our policy to that of the Hussein's. This is a mis-interpretation to put it nicely. Our government has strict guidelines when it comes to torture. Do I believe agencies bend the rules and torture beyond the scope of "acceptibility"....more than likely it has and will happen. But, based on the fact that the microscope is always beaming down on our military and intelligence folks I'd say it's unlikely. Like I mentioned in a prior post...we'll just send them to France and they can plug them in where their nuts get fried and nobody cares because we aren't doing it. To compare our "torture policy" to that of the Hussein regime is magnificent "falsehood". There is a huge difference between the president of a country beheading 30 politicians in front of their peers(live on state owned TV)with a sword for not voting the presidents way and George Bush figuring that water boarding a known terrorists murderer to gain intelligence that may prevent hundreds of thousands or even tens of thousands of innocent citizens from having their lives destroyed or taken away. One big difference is that at the end of the day after the terrorists is done being water boarded or hearing Motley Crue blared into his cell he can go pray to Allah and eat a nice dinner that is culturally approved and payed for by you and me. The dissenting voter will be taken by dump truck to a mass grave, pushed in and covered with sand. His family killed...his daughter given to Uday to screw and murder or enslave for others to rape. I highly suspect that there aren't any rape chairs hidden away in the basement of the Bush compound in Maine or Texas. Another typical left-wing falsehood and you are dead wrong.

"Hardy har har har, don't understand the big picture. I'd call that the pot calling the kettle black..."

I can't agree to disagree with you. You are wrong on so many levels and your misinterpretation of the facts are patent left-wing liberal dribble(incidentally I have more democrat friends than republican friends so I know a little something about centrist views). You are brainwashed, but be sure and vote for the next wonder-politician you guys are so famous for producing. Granholm, Corsine, Carter, Reid, Pelosi, HOWARD DEAN etc etc ad nauseum.....they are doing a wonderful job!
 
Hitch,

I mostly agree with your last statement.

We are a constitutional republic. Majority rule is tempered by the rule of law which serves to protect minorities. The idea of this form of government, like you said, is to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. The constitution limits governmental power and their decisions are subject to review by the judiciary. The bill of rights protects individual rights. John Adams was only one of many players that influenced that document.

BTW, I don't watch CNN (or any TV, for that matter). I am one of the declining number of Americans that gets their information by reading it. It sounds like you may also be.

Charlie
(undergraduate bachelors in political science)
 
Hey Jay,

It is very clear that you and I disagree, but that is the beauty of this county.

You've put a lot of words into my mouth that aren't mine and you completely mis-characterized my position. I do not accept them, and would hope that you have the maturity to separate the drivel that you attribute to me from the words that I actually typed.

Have a great day.

Charlie
 
Surely you can see that I have made some valid points. Unless I have completely lost my mind I did nothing more than comment on your very words. I didn't mis-characterize you nor did I intend to and the drivel was patently yours.

And you are right...that is the great thing about this country...that we can clearly disagree. Unfortunately I don't have near the patience I used to when it comes to these issues. It's damn serious stuff and I don't want to buy you beer at the local tavern this evening. Maybe after a few days.

Have a nice afternoon.

Jay
 
Kevin,

You may not believe it, but the UN does.

Definition of torture:
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/39/a39r046.htm
PART I

Article 1
1. For the purposes of this Convention, the term "torture" means any
act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is
intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or
a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a
third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or
intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on
discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at
the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or
other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or
suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions.

And some of the UN reflections on their review of Guantanamo bay:

" In releasing the report, the experts expressed “utmost concern” over attempts by the US to redefine torture in the framework of the struggle against terrorism. “The interrogation techniques authorized by the Department of Defence, particularly if used simultaneously, amount to degrading treatment,” their statement said."

Check this out:
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/39/a39r046.htm
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=17523&Cr=Guant%C3%A1namo&Cr1=Bay
http://www.un.org/News/briefings/docs/2006/061023_Nowak.doc.htm

Yes, it is convenient to redefine torture when it is inconsistent with our military objective. However, that doesn't make it "not torture". Torture is torture, regardless of the ends it is designed to meet.

Charlie
 
I'm with Steve and Lee on this one. Cold beer and women with "large tracts of land" get my vote any day. Now, if we could just figure out a way to have free bratwurst night every Wednesday....we might just be able to turn this country around!

Nate
 
Nate, as long as we can start them out in a beer and onion bath and then finish them on the grill I'm all for it.
 
you're like a friggin Democrate....Land, Beer and Boobs and you aren't happy unless you get something else......you sure you and Charlie aren't brothers?....(and YES there is a BIG OLE SMILEY FACE there you just can't see it)....

Steve
 
CANDATE ONE:

a bitch who is a lawyer, married to a lawyer.

CANDIDATE TWO:

a lawyer who is married to a bitch who is a lawyer.

CANDIDATE THREE:

a Military Veteran and "War Hero" married to a woman with a
huge chest who owns a beer distributorship.


So I ask you....WHERE is the contest here?


What do they say about talking politics? What is next Religion?

Steve sums it up pretty good.
 
F$*K what they say about talking politics.

With the accessibility of FALSE information these days it is important for debates like this to occur. Americans don't remember what we went through to earn our freedoms and are sitting back and losing more of them every day.

We're fat and lazy and don't know a damn thing about what's really going on out there.

I was surprised when I sat down in a bar in Manitoba last year and heard what a few of the residents had to say about US citizens.

There was no hatred expressed. Only sheer disbelief of how downright stupid most of our country is. Here we are with a constitution guaranteeing the freedoms that we take for granted, and sitting around as they get taken away. It was just like that V-8 commercial.

Then again, why would I expect the breakdown of our population to be any different than it was in the late 1700's. Approx 1/3rd was loyal to the crown, 1/3 was stupid and indifferent, and 1/3 got off their asses and built the country we are ruining today.

Where is the outrage in something other then PRESIDENT BUSH? Grow up and get educated, you all are embarrassing me to no end.

-D
 
Dave - What makes you think you have better insight than anyone else who has responded ? I'm offering my opinion but don't proclaim to be any more insightful than anyone else.

Did or did not Bush make the same mistake the Democrats made in Viet Nam ?

Mistakes are ok so long as the lives and limbs of our sons and daughters aren't the price paid for that mistake.

My last response to this post. Beer and Boobs sounds better and better after listening to so many self proclaimed experts, insiders or whatever you may be. Political discussion should occur,but it's taking on a personal flavor that is distasteful.

Bill
 
Bill-

I just re-read my last line and I meant to direct it to Americans in general. Not just the members here.

What makes my insight any better? Logic.

I haven't said much here and don't have the patience to argue over the internet much anymore. I generally agree with what Jay and Hitch have said, and find holes in some of the other's arguments. Holes that are based on mis-education and illogical thought.

Beer and Boobs are great, but the old fart that will comes with them has a lot to prove to get my approval. I will say he had some serious balls in Vietnam and I thank him for his service, but his record in the Senate and his thoughts on Global warming and the direction of the Republican party are anything by impressive.

-D
 
well after reading all that crap i've come to a few conclusions.
#1 i like beer and i like boobs......i'm probably going to vote for mccain, but i want my friends back. the ones that are in iraq still fighting. i saw the father of a friend of mine the other day at the range, he told me SHE was doing alright and her kid was being taken care of by the father. he showed me a pic or her shouldering a 50 bmg.i haven't seen her in 3 years.
#2 i'm gonna have to get a check up because apparently Charlie is a cancer and i came into contact with him last fall.
#3 yes Vermont's government is mostly out-of-staters. i don't know why that is but i have a feeling its because a true Vermonters mentality is "what ever you do on your side of the fence is fine with me as long as it dosen't affect what goes on on my side" we have to have some controlling folks from else where to come in here and run the show or i guess we'd all just be minding our own business. wouldn't that be a shame.
and you know i guess i wouldnt mind moving a little more north, they have a better dollar, better beer and good poutine.
#4 guns designed for the military should be in the hands or the military only. now i suppose if you want to fight this even more you could say that the birth of the gun was for the killing of ones enemy then so be it. i think if a gun designed with the tactical intent in mind then a tactical permit should be issued. a dealer for one should not be able to sell a gun to anyone with out this permit. you need a license to drive a car which is a safe in the right hands but deadly weapon in the wrong.
#5 i have a lot to learn about the world. at the age of 21 i'm more then likely one of the youngest here. listening to the views here and the information spouted out has given me more then what i can handle for stuff to think about during a work day.

im not a DEM im not a REP im a decide what i like and vote for the person who best represents that-ian.

ps conceived canadien, born american, raised vermonter!!!

eddie
 
Back
Top