I too grew up waterfowl hunting in N.E. Alabama (my wife and I still do), specifically from the Goose Pond Colony area up north past County Park, Jone’s Cove, Randall’s Chapel, and up past Coon Creek WMA. In fact our female Chesapeake Bay Retriever’s name is Carolyn’s Coon Creek Kyla – Call Name Kyla. I have several thoughts on the cause of the degraded waterfowl populations within the Lake Guntersville Waterway System (from the Guntersville Dam up to the Alabama/Tennessee Line near Bridgeport/South Pittsburg. There is no doubt the waterfowl hunting is not what it once was “Back in the Day”. For the Lake Guntersville Waterway System, the loss of habitat due to drought conditions, urban sprawl, and poor ecosystem management practices are at the top of my list as leading contributors. Of these three influences, we as waterfowl hunters/conservationists essentially have control/input on two of them, urban sprawl, and ecosystem management.
The urban sprawl can be controlled through Zoning Enforcement; a concept which I believe is unknown to most Jackson County residents. A few months past, I read a Scottsboro newspaper article in which a resident of a newly formed community in the Goosepond Colony area was complaining of being woken up by what seemed to be a war-zone on the morning opener of duck season this past year. Well, welcome to the outdoors. What exactly did he think would happen when he bought land and built a house smack dab in the middle of one of the more popular duck hunting areas in Jackson County? This individual wanted to introduce legislation to the City Council to ban waterfowl hunting in that area. Good luck on that one.
Ecosystem management is questionable (to me) in the Guntersville Lake Waterway System as well. There are two rather large refuge systems in place in the Guntersville Lake Waterway System, one on the southern end, and one on the northern end. There are also several WMAs in place as well. I question the funds distribution and utilization of both (funds generated from the sell of WMA permits and State Waterfowl Stamps and how those funds are distributed). Ducks Unlimited has assisted with some past projects on the WMAs, and I believe future projects are planned as well. But I just don’t see the logic in Ducks Unlimited creating a 15 acre(ish) flooded corn field within a several hundred acre WMA that is hunted everyday out of the week, from sun-up till sun-down during waterfowl season. How does one expect to sustain a decent (if any) duck population within the WMAs during duck season if the ducks are swatted at every day out of the week, all day long? If the thought process is one of “migrating ducks won’t know the difference”, then some folks need to be educated a little more on animal survival instincts. “Good Seasons” are “Good” because there are bunches of yearling ducks who have not been around long enough to A). Be educated by other ducks, and B). Get educated by themselves. Set hunting restrictions for the WMAs (days of the week and time of day) allowing a rest period for resident and transitional waterfowl.
In addition to the DU projects, there are several areas flooded during waterfowl season to essentially “create” a wetlands habitat where a food source has been planted and then flooded. This is where I question funds distribution and BMPs utilized within these WMAs. I’m not familiar with how funds generated from the sales of WMA permits and State Duck Stamps are distributed, but it seems to me the only logical distribution process would be based solely on the level of hunter activity. For example, if WMA Permits are sold within Jackson County, then the proceeds from those respective sales need to remain in Jackson County. Same goes for sales of the State Duck Stamp. State Duck Stamp sales should be earmarked or identified in some fashion so the money generated is allocated to the locale of the sale. I can think of several ways to do this, it can’t be difficult, even if they are Internet sales. If the funds are currently distributed in this fashion, then someone somewhere needs to seriously consider auditing the program to see where those funds are going, because from what I see on the consumer end, it isn’t going for the ducks.
Regarding BMPs within the WMAs themselves; if drought is an issue for crops during the growing season, then pump in irrigation water. If crops can be grown in the middle of the desert, than growing corn or millet or rice in a WMA that parallels the Tennessee River should not be a huge undertaking. If I as an individual land owner have the resources to dig a well down into one of the largest underground aquifers in the Southern Region and flood a 15 acre shallow pond planted w/a food source and create an attractive habitat for waterfowl, then the Alabama DNR ought to be able to do one hell of a job with the resources available to them (monetary and personnel) to create and sustain an ecosystem for waterfowl. If the Alabama DNR can’t accomplish this, then it is because of limitations imposed upon them by a bureaucratic process and incompetence on their part.
And lastly, my thoughts on “Out of Towner’s” hunting the Guntersville Lake Waterway System is “Your Welcome Anytime.” Sales of food, gas, hunting supplies, lodging, etc., etc., etc., go directly back into an already struggling economy in northern Alabama. If hunter “overcrowding” is an issue that needs to be addressed, then incorporate it into ecosystem BMPs. It’s a management thing, Stupid!
Cheers!