Vince Pagliaroli
Well-known member
"To read the full Cornell study, go to www.sciencedirect.com and search waterfowl contaminants."
Many years ago from similar information I stopped eating the small piece of meat next to the breastbone. It is kind of like the lateral line on fish and hold more of the chemical contamination.
I got that from NJ F&W many years ago-it had to be the in the 90's. If it's not true I'll start eating that part again. I appreciate you looking into it, because I have been robbing myself!I'd be a little surprised if that small muscle (the supracoracoideus) had higher levels of pollutants than the breast (pectoralis). You comment got me thinking and I specifically searched the scientific literature and didn't find anything, so I don't know what to say - maybe some bad information or something lost in translation?!?! I don't know.
Thank you Todd for the info. Much appreciated.
That small muscle is my favorite cut of the breast meat. When I was camp cook each day when we butchered ducks that "fillet" as my buddy called it was saved for Duck Fillet Omelets on Sunday. As there was no Sunday hunting they were a special treat that he made after morning scouting. I tend to use all parts of birds not just the breast meat. Could be that someday they will do a study on longtime waterfowl hunters that have eaten more than their share of waterfowl.
Best regards
Vince