Mike, I guess I'll just make a few points. If you look at page 15 of the brant management plan that I linked, you'll see that if the population grows what the limits would be and if it declines what the limits how the limits will be reduced. Your concern that regulations only take away hunting opportunity and never restore previous limits is dependent upon the population count. If it grows longer seasons will be implemented.
The US Government collects excise taxes on firearms, ammunition, archery equipment and other items. That money is distributed back to the state fish and wildlife agencies based on the number of hunting licenses sold. This system has been in place since the 1930s. It is not a subsidy. If state license sales go down then they will get less funding.
As for pintails, the rationale for the potential increase in bag limit is due to the feds realizing that the models used for setting hunting regulations were too restrictive based on new information.
The US Government collects excise taxes on firearms, ammunition, archery equipment and other items. That money is distributed back to the state fish and wildlife agencies based on the number of hunting licenses sold. This system has been in place since the 1930s. It is not a subsidy. If state license sales go down then they will get less funding.
As for pintails, the rationale for the potential increase in bag limit is due to the feds realizing that the models used for setting hunting regulations were too restrictive based on new information.