Honestly when that Mallard was carved I had no clue what it would look like just like the bluebill and ringneck. I told him what was needed size and species and he did the rest. We completely trusted his decisions on the carvings and he didn't let us down. People will think what they want and unfortunately to take stabs at someone who is now gone from this world is as low as low can be to make such accusations. Period. Haters are always gonna hate.Rick:
Just so I don't go off, Frank Peeters was a very talented carver in his day and he didn't "copy" other peoples work. He and Lou knew each other well and it's not something that would have happened.
I threw away the decoys I finally got from Ure duck. Horribly cast and broken feet right out of the package. ZERO customer service.... Z-E-R-O.
Rick:
Just so I don't go off, Frank Peeters was a very talented carver in his day and he didn't "copy" other peoples work. He and Lou knew each other well and it's not something that would have happened.
Rick:
Just so I don't go off, Frank Peeters was a very talented carver in his day and he didn't "copy" other peoples work. He and Lou knew each other well and it's not something that would have happened.
Then what did happen?
I would think that a photo comparison of the decoys would be an obvious first step to clear this up. There has been a lot of monkey business in the boat and decoy molding world over the years and it would be really nice if this forum's membership was on the side of the craftsmen that are in the right - as I believe we have been over the years. I'd like some clarifying evidence posted up.
Here is a few photos. first the ringneck that Frank carved for us. Note its still in raw wood. Next the upright mallard head. this is the wood head and a body. I dont have the original wood bodies here for the mallard right now as they are at the tool and die company who is making our molds as they had to be scanned into 3d. But I assure you they are no way shape or form copies as weas suggested by RLLigman and Frank Peeters carved them with his very own hands. And with the proof I believe RLLigman owes an apology for wrongly acusing a person who cannot stand up for himself due to passing several years ago. That was just wrong and totally uncalled for. I have paid for my mistakes and wont deny them. But for guys to just shoot off the hip and make these accusations its getting old hearing it all the time. I own everything I make rightfully which is alot more than I can say about alot of others in the boat and decoy business.Rick:
Just so I don't go off, Frank Peeters was a very talented carver in his day and he didn't "copy" other peoples work. He and Lou knew each other well and it's not something that would have happened.
Then what did happen?
I would think that a photo comparison of the decoys would be an obvious first step to clear this up. There has been a lot of monkey business in the boat and decoy molding world over the years and it would be really nice if this forum's membership was on the side of the craftsmen that are in the right - as I believe we have been over the years. I'd like some clarifying evidence posted up.
Yes, beautifully executed mallards...from what I recall, by Keith Mueller.
[font=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica]"Id guess they both used the same pattern possibly. No worries we have the same issue with our Bluebill that Peeters carved it looks just like the one he carved for GHG. Good think we have the wooden originals and our receipt of purchase to the wood decoys. Our bluebills were done before GHG's
I think our mallard is more different than Lous than you think. The tails much thicker and wider so it dont break and the body itself is also wider and taller. Similar yes. the same not at all.
But your right it sure rides the water like no other." Tony Homer PM sent Feb. 9, 2016[/font]