Hi Steve, I wrote a long and thought out reply earlier today on my phone, then jumped to another page for a link, and lost the whole thing. The gist was that I have not used xynole myself, only dynel, and was hoping you guys could fill me in! I do know that Reuel Parker specifies xynole for a covering for all of his boats, and he is a designer/builder that I have great respect for, with many large cruising boats under his belt, and maybe 50,000 sea miles. I did find this quote from Tom Lathrop, another designer builder-
<It depends on what you want the sheath to do. For stiffness, glass is much better than the synthetics like Dynel, Xynole or polypropylene Vectra. For abrasion resistance, these synthetics are far better. Kevlar is the king but very expensive and difficult to use.
I made objective tests of abrasion and peel strength of fabrics several years ago and there is an article of these tests in an old Boatbuilder magazine. A single layer of Xynole is a bit more than 6 times as abrasion resistant than 9oz glass cloth, both saturated and covered with epoxy. On a per thickness basis the difference is about 2.4 times. Vectra and Dynel are similar to Xynole in abrasion.
For peel strength, Xynole is by far the best, Vectra is next and glass is not quite as good as Vectra. Dynel failled all attempts to peel it because it broke at the peel line every time. I have had fir plywood to check through Dynel after years of use but never through any of the others. Based on my experience, I would never use Dynel for anything.>
I think xynole is quite a bit more flexible than glass, which is good for trad. planked boat coverings. If a new design were to specify glass, like Devlin's S&G boats, then you wouldn't substitute xynole or dynel. I would buy a yard, and do some wet out tests, but it has interesting properties for the job at hand here.
Nice sneakboxes, both of you! Makes me want to build one.
Jim