Some lake trout fishing photos

John Fraser

Well-known member
A cold evening on George Washington's Birthday.

10991720_361157617420965_6477122267101827330_o.jpg


Ben with his first laker.

Benwithlaker_zps405b6220.jpg


Fish dinner with veggies from the garden.

10994428_363480060522054_1494799104740031104_n.jpg

 
Is that lake trout breaded and baked? Never tried that--I mostly smoke or grill lakers. I find them a lot more oily and fishy than other trout.
 
Jeff: Breaded and fried. These lakers are very mild and flaky. They come from Skaneateles Lake where they eat lots of insects and small perch. They don't grow as large but they are better eating.

If you catch a laker from one of the other Finger Lakes where they've been eating alewives and smelt, then yes they will be stronger and more oily.
 
Cool. We didn't have them in the lakes in PA where I used to ice fish. But we did have brookies in one lake, and caught them in very shallow water under the ice. fun to catch.
 
OOOOOOOOOH, those insect eating togue ARE good eating. We don't have that much here. They mostly feed on smelt, alewives, whitefish (in the few places we still have good whitefish populations) or other bait fish.

But there are a couple of lakes where their diet is mostly insects and aquatic invertebrates, and those fish are tasty. I understand that in much of Canada there are lake trout populations that mostly feed on aquatic invertebrates and are highly desired as table fish.

Most of my lake trout get grilled over low heat with some kind of citrus/maple marinade or glaze, which seems to cut the fishiness. A few go into the smoker, and those are exellent.
 
Jeff: Breaded and fried. These lakers are very mild and flaky. They come from Skaneateles Lake where they eat lots of insects and small perch. They don't grow as large but they are better eating.

If you catch a laker from one of the other Finger Lakes where they've been eating alewives and smelt, then yes they will be stronger and more oily.

Cool post. Is the flesh pinkish like you see with a lot of invert eaters?
 
Cool, thanks! I've eaten more than my share of finger lakes lakers (Cayuga) and they fall near the bottom of my list for freshwater fish. I've eaten pink fleshed lakers from out west and found them quite good (but they were usually smaller fish).

T
 
Do you remove the pinbones and if so, what do you find is the best way? Pinbones are the only thing I don't like about trout.

Mike
 
Fish are supposed to taste fishy. But then i am a salt water guy,stripers,bluefish,porgies,etc.
We even liked flying fish,you know scoters.
 
Mike, remove the fillet and skin it. Now, lay the fillet former skin side down with the tail section facing away from you on your cutting board and run your index fingertip down the row of pin bones. Use the sharp tip of fillet knife to trace down the line of pin bones, making the cut in parallel along the bone row(down and angling toward the section of the fillet that surrounded the belly cavity) until you slice completely through the fillet. Now, make a second cut on the other side of the pin bone row, down its length. What the finished, bone free, fillet should look like is a rough "Y" with one arm lobe thicker than the other.

Hope this helps. You can likely find a YouTube video to supplement this written explanation of pin bone removal.
 
By pinbones I think you are talking about the row of small bones along the top of the ribs near where they meet the backbone. I notice similar bones in many freshwater fish. When I fillet I cut down along the back to the point where the ribs meet the spine. I then back the knife off a bit and "swing wide" around that row of bones. If its a good size fish, I'll continue cutting the fillet off down along the side of the ribcage after I've avoided the pin bones.
 
Cool, thanks! I've eaten more than my share of finger lakes lakers (Cayuga) and they fall near the bottom of my list for freshwater fish. I've eaten pink fleshed lakers from out west and found them quite good (but they were usually smaller fish).

T

There is a lake in Northern Ontario where we would catch lakers and take a few small ones to eat. When we cut them open we would decide how to cook them. Pink flesh got breaded and fried and was very tasty. White flesh... not so much. Strange how fish in the same lake had different diets depending on the area of the lake.
 
Some interesting info:
Lake trout inhabit cold, oxygen-rich waters. They are pelagic during the period of summer stratification in dimictic lakes, often living at depths of 20–60 m (60–200 ft).
The lake trout is a slow-growing fish, typical of oligotrophic waters. It is also very late to mature. Populations are extremely susceptible to overfishing. Many native lake trout populations have been severely damaged through the combined effects of hatchery stocking (planting) and over harvest.

Two basic types of lake trout populations are generally accepted. Some lakes do not have pelagic forage fish during the period of summer stratification. In these lakes, lake trout take on a life history known as planktivory. Lake trout in planktivorous populations are highly abundant, grow very slowly and mature at relatively small sizes. In those lakes that do contain deep-water forage, lake trout become piscivorous. Piscivorous lake trout grow much more quickly, mature at a larger size and are less abundant. Notwithstanding differences in abundance, the density of biomass of lake trout is fairly consistent in similar lakes, regardless of whether the lake trout populations they contain are planktivorous or piscivorous. In Lake Superior, three distinct phenotypes of lake trout persist, commonly known as "siscowet", "paperbelly" and "lean". The distinct groups operate, to some level at least, under genetic control and are not mere environmental adaptations.[6] Siscowet numbers, especially, have become greatly depressed over the years due to a combination of the extirpation of some of the fish's deep water coregonine prey and to overexploitation. Siscowet tend to grow extremely large and fat and attracted great commercial interest in the last century. Their populations have rebounded since 1970, with one estimate putting the number in Lake Superior at 100 million.[7]
 
Back
Top