The fate of the men who signed the Declaration of Independence

Todd Duncan Tennyson

Well-known member
Ever wonder what happened to the 56 men who signed the Declaration of Independence?

Five signers were captured by the British as traitors and tortured before they died.

Twelve had their homes ransacked and burned.

Two lost their sons serving in the Revolutionary Army; another had two sons captured.

Nine of the 56 fought and died from wounds or hardships of the Revolutionary War.
They signed and they pledged their lives, their fortunes, and their sacred honor.

What kind of men were they?

Twenty-four were lawyers and jurists; eleven were merchants; nine were farmers and
large plantation owners; men of means, well educated, but they signed the Declaration of Independence
knowing full well that the penalty would be death if they were captured.

Carter Braxton of Virginia, a wealthy planter and trader, saw his ships swept from the seas by the
British Navy. He sold his home and properties to pay his debts, and died in rags.

Thomas McKeam was so hounded by the British that he was forced to move his family almost constantly.
He served in the Congress without pay, and his family was kept in hiding. His possessions were taken from him
and poverty was his reward.

Vandals or soldiers looted the properties of Dillery, Hall, Clymer,Walton, Gwinnett, Heyward, Ruttledge,
and Middleton.
At the battle of Yorktown, Thomas Nelson, Jr., noted that the British General Cornwallis had taken
over the Nelson home for his headquarters. He quietly urged General George Washington to open fire.
The home was destroyed, and Nelson died bankrupt.

Francis Lewis had his home and properties destroyed. The enemy jailed his wife, and she died within a few months.

John Hart was driven from his wife's bedside as she was dying. Their 13 children fled for their lives.
His fields and his gristmill were laid to waste. For more than a year he lived in forests and caves,
returning home to find his wife dead and his children vanished.

So, take a few minutes while enjoying your 4th of July holiday and silently thank these patriots.
It's not much to ask for the price they paid.
 
Okay, I'm an engineer used to working with facts, so when something like this comes along, again, I check it out lightly before sending it along. Some of the above is true, some embellished, some not true. Snopes has a good write up for those who want a few more details.

Scott
 
Good job Todd. they don't teach that anymore.

and they shouldn't since it is far from the truth.

There was a great deal of sacrifice by many people to get this nation off the ground in the 1770's, but there is no need to make stuff up. The facts are much more interesting than the hyperbole quoted in the OP.
 
Scott,
thanks for the link,,,,,,but
whoever wrote that snoops story sure didnt think it was much of a thing to sign that declaration. Their wording of it makes it out to be just another letter that a bunch of arrogant white guys signed, as some trivial notion, telling the Ruler of their Government, Assigned by God, to go screw himself.
That same ruler had armed troops in their backyards and was looking to enforce his will on their taxable assets.
It just seems like the writer dosnt think much of having to declare war on the Tax collector, and his un-elected Ruling King. Like all wars the entire population suffered from the fighting and that should not be minimized. But neither should the activities of those who had quite a lot to loose in choosing the Liberty of the American Continent from Great Britian.
I am not defending the fabrication of fact in the original Signers article, just knocking the lousy revisionist attitude of the writer correcting the issues toward the men who kept up the efforts to free our country from the British tyrants.
Non of the men were perfect, and their work was not either, but without them we would be a hole lot less of a nation in my opinion.
Just ask Col. Ledyard how it worked out for him and his efforts. (Not a signer but a risk taker who lost it all for us.) I just wonder how people today would feel if New London was burned tonight over a tax fight.

All DBHP, have a great Fourth,
From the Butler Family.
 
Bob, Interesting take on the read. I read it differently. I didn't get the sense that there was any down playing of their part in signing the Decoration of Independence. Any disdain I felt seemed to be directed at the need to embellish reality or out right fabricate stories to glorify historical people. What's wrong with the truth? It doesn't make what they accomplished less spectacular. Many or maybe even most of the separationalists and rebels had legal and financial drivers for wanting the change in government. The replacement government hadn't even been designed yet. You might even wonder just how oppressive the British were when you realize that our brothers in Canada didn't see the need to succeed and many (majority?) of the Quebec population were French and had no love of the British.

My family had a number of Tories in it that were living successfully under the "existing government". Some of them were driven to the Maritime Provinces when Boston fell to the Rebels. Of course I had family on the other side too. I also grew up reading Kenneth Roberts' historical novels. Most of his novels were written from the Rebel side but the book that opened my eyes the most was Oliver Wiswell which was written from the Tory view. Always remember that roughly 1/3 of the colonists wanted independence, 1/3 were Tories and the remaining 1/3 just wanted to be left alone. It was the British policy of treating all colonists as bad guys and throwing foreign mercenaries at them that fueled the successful separation.

The United States of America that resulted from the separation is incredible, and a real tribute to the Revolution. But at the time the war started and the Declaration of Independence was signed the future was unknown. Some wanted independent states, others wanted a weak central government with strong states an obviously some wanted a strong central government who could defend the nation from aggressors. The signers signed facing the unknown which may be the bravest thing anyone can do. They had hope, goals and wanted the chance to achieve them. The signers don't need embellishment.

Always take popular history with a grain of salt as the victor gets to write the history and all blemishes are concealed. Look behind the glorified stories and understand that these were real people, with diverse motivations and you may find an even more remarkable story. If you want to round out your view take the time to read Oliver Wiswell. Then give thought to today's world. We are trying to stabilize countries where a significant group wants to fight us, a bunch want our help and the center wants to be left alone. We need to learn how to shift the views of their population. If we treat them all like they want to fight us, they will. History, learn from it or repeat it!

I sure wish I could have made the cook out last weekend, but no my In-Laws were here.

Best,
Scott
 
Scott,
thanks for the link,,,,,,but
whoever wrote that snoops story sure didnt think it was much of a thing to sign that declaration. Their wording of it makes it out to be just another letter that a bunch of arrogant white guys signed, as some trivial notion, telling the Ruler of their Government, Assigned by God, to go screw himself.
That same ruler had armed troops in their backyards and was looking to enforce his will on their taxable assets.
It just seems like the writer dosnt think much of having to declare war on the Tax collector, and his un-elected Ruling King. Like all wars the entire population suffered from the fighting and that should not be minimized. But neither should the activities of those who had quite a lot to loose in choosing the Liberty of the American Continent from Great Britian.
I am not defending the fabrication of fact in the original Signers article, just knocking the lousy revisionist attitude of the writer correcting the issues toward the men who kept up the efforts to free our country from the British tyrants.
Non of the men were perfect, and their work was not either, but without them we would be a hole lot less of a nation in my opinion.
Just ask Col. Ledyard how it worked out for him and his efforts. (Not a signer but a risk taker who lost it all for us.) I just wonder how people today would feel if New London was burned tonight over a tax fight.

All DBHP, have a great Fourth,
From the Butler Family.

You don't know much about Snopes. They provide the service of correcting the huge amount of miss information out there. They don't wish to hurt anyones feelings over it, but it does happen. Just like it happened to you, and it caused you to read things into their piece that are not there.

The content of the original post is "revisionist". The Snopes editor outlays nothing but facts. How can facts be revisionist?

The Snopes out lay of facts does not contain any language that supports your argument.

I think you need to read the last paragraph in the Snopes piece. That paragraph makes your argument moot, but then the whole piece is about making sure the facts are known and not about glorifing the Signers. There are many other sources for that so Snopes does not need to take up that standard and wave it.
 
hey Scott
I did enjoy the info on the fact check but I still think it had more personal interpretation than I like in my news or history. I agree that the story is not black and white, but I still feel the same.
I like to come to my own decision based on the info provided rather than be told of it by the author. I grew up reading "boy captive of Deerfield" as a requirement of all students who lived in that town. French and Indian war, but just as effective inproviding a basic understanding of just how far we have come
my mothers side is DAR and my dads side was in at the start of the Hartford colony, but I don't have good info on their loyality durring the revolution. need to get into that. now, civil war, I've got the unit flag and metals from that mess.
PS just learning how to type on a itouch keyboard
Have a great fourth
 
THE COUPLE THAT WRITE SNOOPS,HAVE A LIBERAL AGENDA.CAN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU READ AND MOST ANYTHING ON VIDEO ANYMORE.
 
Todd,
I too thank you for bringing out those interesting notes from our history. I always felt that the signers used large lettering of their name as a taunt, or "how dare you"attitude about being ruled. Whether or not those facts are exactly as they happened, our founders really did risk everything for this country.
 
THE COUPLE THAT WRITE SNOOPS,HAVE A LIBERAL AGENDA.CAN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU READ AND MOST ANYTHING ON VIDEO ANYMORE.


So facts are part of the "Liberal Agenda"?

Being correct is also part of said agenda?

Making stuff up so that it sounds too good to be true and then sending it around the word in e-mail to thousands of people is what you prefer happend?

Didn't they do this in Russia, with that, that, Oh what is the word....Propaganda?
 
SO READ CARL'S POST ABOUT LIGHT READING FOR THE FORTH.SNOOPS IS CORRECT,AS THEY SEE CORRECT.WHOEVER WRITES THE TEXT BOOKS TEACHES THE HISTORY.THE TRUTH CAN BE FOUND IF YOU WANT IT.THE MINOR EMBELISHMENTS IN TOOD'S POST ARE MINOR IN LIGHT OF THE OVERALL DIRECTION THE LEFT WANTS OUR HISTORYTO BE REMEMBERED.
THE COUPLE THAT WRITE SNOOPS,HAVE A LIBERAL AGENDA.CAN'T BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU READ AND MOST ANYTHING ON VIDEO ANYMORE.


So facts are part of the "Liberal Agenda"?

Being correct is also part of said agenda?

Making stuff up so that it sounds too good to be true and then sending it around the word in e-mail to thousands of people is what you prefer happend?

Didn't they do this in Russia, with that, that, Oh what is the word....Propaganda?
 
Thanks Joe,
I did just that on the Fourth as I went to bed. I hadnt read it all the way thru since 10th grade. Had an excellent teacher for US history that year.
I agree with Ray, the facts are what matter. There is plenty of good right there,,,,,,,,, but I still argue that the writer of that article was knocking the signers as just a group of guys who got remembered over the rest. I feel they were special and deserve the merit they get, and what they risked and accomplished was amazing. Even if some of it did not play out in their lifetimes.
I am watching as my kids are getting stuffed a bunch in school that minimizes the founders and their work. Also our present day accomplishments. Not to mention the pure garbage science they are getting when it comes to conservation and hunting. Find me a public school program in the east that recognizes the accomplishments of sportsmen to wildlife and I will send my kids there.

This country is not perfect and never will be, but it is the best damn one I know and I will argue her accomplishments over any other. She has stuck her neck out for the rest of the world time and again when one of the other nations goes off the deep end.
Those that knock her today and keep asking for more from her are sure awful easy on the rest of the bunch sitting at the UN table.
 
Probably even more importantly is create history of your/our own! Hopefully someone will be voicing their side of an opinion about the current day's men and women and the accomplishments and failures that make us better country and world leader. I am so thankful I live in the greatest country on the planet. God Bless the USA.
Jim/Fowlfishing
 
Just read this thread.....
"Minor Embelishments?"

If that was "minor" embelishments, I would hate to see full out artistic license taken with the facts!

I'm as patriotic as the next guy and lean a little right of center on most issues, but I dont see how revealing the historical "mistakes" in the orginal post in any way demeans the acts of our founding fathers.
What does demean their acts are people who create stories loaded with "minor embelishements" and present them as fact or uses them to further one agenda or another.
 
Back
Top