Steve Sanford
Well-known member
FYI~
I just finished my first-ever burlapping - 10 Herter's Model 72 Broadbill. It takes about twice as long as it does to apply the epoxy + sawdust I have been trying since last year. I am sure the burlap + mastic produces a stronger, more durable decoy - but it was also clear while I was handling the birds that it adds more weight.
The burlapped bird is the one on the scale:
So, the scientist in me decided to see what the difference was, on average. I used our postal scale (which tops out at 5 lbs) to weight a 5-bird bird sample of each of 4 different types:
Original (flat-bottom) with epoxy + sawdust
Keel-bottom with factory paint
Keel-bottom with epoxy + sawdust
Keel-bottom with mastic + burlap
All sample batches included used decoys. So, some may have absorbed moisture; some had repairs (for example, some had heavier screw-eyes fastening the heads). Except for the factory-paint batch, all had the head-neck area reinforced with epoxy and 6-oz 'glass cloth - and all heads were coated with epoxy + sawdust. None had lost ballast weights. And, with one exception, all were Hens (that's the scientist in me again.....)
Here are the results:
The mastic + burlap adds about 8.8 ounces to each factory-painted bird. The epoxy + sawdust adds only about 1.6 ounces.
It was interesting that the Original flat-bottom birds were a bit heavier than the newer keeled ones. I believe several of the older ones had absorbed moisture over the years. My experience is that they never lose most of the moisture - like the open-celled styrofoam floatation in early boats. Also, I know that my (my Dad's) older birds were campaigned hard - and would see the water every day for the last 30 or 40 days of the seasons in the 1950s and 60s.
Now, on to the next batch....
SJS
I just finished my first-ever burlapping - 10 Herter's Model 72 Broadbill. It takes about twice as long as it does to apply the epoxy + sawdust I have been trying since last year. I am sure the burlap + mastic produces a stronger, more durable decoy - but it was also clear while I was handling the birds that it adds more weight.
The burlapped bird is the one on the scale:

So, the scientist in me decided to see what the difference was, on average. I used our postal scale (which tops out at 5 lbs) to weight a 5-bird bird sample of each of 4 different types:
Original (flat-bottom) with epoxy + sawdust
Keel-bottom with factory paint
Keel-bottom with epoxy + sawdust
Keel-bottom with mastic + burlap
All sample batches included used decoys. So, some may have absorbed moisture; some had repairs (for example, some had heavier screw-eyes fastening the heads). Except for the factory-paint batch, all had the head-neck area reinforced with epoxy and 6-oz 'glass cloth - and all heads were coated with epoxy + sawdust. None had lost ballast weights. And, with one exception, all were Hens (that's the scientist in me again.....)
Here are the results:

The mastic + burlap adds about 8.8 ounces to each factory-painted bird. The epoxy + sawdust adds only about 1.6 ounces.
It was interesting that the Original flat-bottom birds were a bit heavier than the newer keeled ones. I believe several of the older ones had absorbed moisture over the years. My experience is that they never lose most of the moisture - like the open-celled styrofoam floatation in early boats. Also, I know that my (my Dad's) older birds were campaigned hard - and would see the water every day for the last 30 or 40 days of the seasons in the 1950s and 60s.
Now, on to the next batch....
SJS