@William Reinicke now that we’ve thoroughly derailed the thread…
That, and the white coats in retriever trials have never made sense to me. Why does my dog need to be able to mark and retrieve a bird that I couldn’t have possibly shot?
White coats are so the dog can see your handle out from super insane far distances. More seen in field trials vs hunt tests. I never field trialed because I didnt understand those games and the hunt tests seemed more up my alley and what seemed fun to me. I did test out the white coat theory and my first girl did run a 250 yard blind successfully with a white coat on. Best I could do in a camo jacket was 130-140 yards. At 300 though, I couldnt tell if she just lost faith/confidence in the distance or couldnt see me, but she really lost it and it wasnt overly successful. I walked in about 75 yards with her sat, and then gave a hand signal and she worked right to it again.
I realize that these scenarios exist to showcase the best of the best, but it seems like as that happens, we risk taking the hunt out of the test.
In your situation above, drop a second duck in that current and it’s half a mile downstream if the dog won’t run the bank and get back quickly with the first one.
Well, theres lots of folks that play the game and rarely hunt. Theres lots of folks who are running multiple dogs and training other hunters dogs. Multiple folks that take the dogs to a certain level and then turn and sell them for more money. I get it and most people buying these dogs are not necessarily hunting out lots of river situations. My experience, is true river hunters rarely have a well handled dog and actually promote breaking so they can get in and get out quicker, vs the pond hunter who has the steadiest most obedient dog.
So I dont disagree with lots of the tests and they sure can be fun. I had more fun getting to the master levels because those dogs were there as hunters. The little show dogs werent at that level and the tests went much quicker to get through and it was just a nice display of dog work. It did get technical though, with handle marks counted, how well the dog ran a straight line, poison birds, etc etc. I loved that level of dog work, but I was young and at the time, I thought if I had a dog that could do all that stuff, I had the best of the best hunting dog for any situation. It wasnt until I found myself in that situation, that I realized that wasnt true. I do so much diverse hunting, that I just didnt agree with some of the tests for myself and my situations, ultimately not making me a player for the higher levels of testing. Kind of made me re-evaluate actually playing the games anymore.
I do think the tests are set up to display the best of the best, especially for those that might be too old to hunt hard anymore, and this is their niche being in the dog world and holding onto their little snippet of the waterfowl world. We had an amazing handler, who showed up to tests with a cane and could barely walk, but gosh he had FINE dogs. The dogs love it as much as we do. I say it all the time, I dont think I would waterfowl without a dog at this point. Even when they arent so good, like my current little goober. But I still have tons of fun with her in the field. Plus, the really good dogs, absolutely love working through that pressure. When I was training my first, the more pressure I put on her, the more she seemed to get locked in and really love the games more. She absolutely lost her mind with excitement when she saw me pick up the shock collar, she just knew we were going to retrieve or work on stuff. Even if it was simple tune up circle drills with 10-15 yard retrieves.
So I dont want to take away from the games too much because I have hunted over some FINE master hunters in the field. I would say 85% of the finished and master hunters, hunt even better because most hunts are not as technical as a test. I do believe there is a 15% that puts those dogs in situations, where their training makes them less successful and with my style of hunting, I do believe I fall in that 15%. I had to really evaluate what was smart for me. Having a ribboned dog or a successful field dog. The field dog wins every time in my brain.
My girl failed 1 test, and it was comical. After you ran the test, you had to sit your dog at the line and let the next dog perform the test. It was to see how they minded and didnt break with the work of another dog. I would set up two dog stands and shoot pigeons on a dairy. Thats how I trained steadiness. What I never trained was for a dog running around in circles and not doing the test very well and making them sit through that for 5-7 minutes. It was shoot, let them sit for a minute, send a dog, run out pick it up, back to the dog stand. Quick work, great steadiness, and lots of repetition. So we get to the test, she runs a flawless test, I get to the line, next dog steps up and im sitting there. Handler sends the dog, all is well... until the dog starts fumbling on its face and not doing so good in the test. My girl starts to get fired up, like she knows where the bird is and how to run the test. I can see it in her eyes, she isnt going to watch this dummy be a dummy much longer. Im trying to settle her down with gentle talking, but I can see the battle being lost. Her inner self isnt going to let this dog run in circles for much longer. Im telling her sit and trying to keep her calm.... but after about 5 minutes of her sitting there watching this dog struggle, the competitive nature won the battle and she bolts right out and picks up that bird. Failed test for me and failed test for the handler, due to the length of which it was taking the dog to run the test. I just giggled and put her away and gave her some ear scratches. It was fun.