In reply to:
"I read earlier, and re-read now your post, and frankly am a little puzzled...doesn't this decoy have "cheeks""
&
"don't know how to take the opening statement or the wording used in your reply as it seems to be directed towards what I said in my reply to Nick's post."
Whooooee! Looks like I might have pissed in the Cheerios....
Chuck,
My comment at the start of the post
was most certainly intended to poke a little fun at Paulie, because it seemed like everyone who replied was missing the basic mistake I was seeing. I assumed he would take it as such... and probably appreciate the comments as well as the pictures included to clarify. Guess its true that when you assume it moght make an
ass (out of)
u &
me. But what the heck, I'll live... even without feeling the love.
Actually Chuck, you have selected a perfect picture to display what I was talking about. Perhaps the problem in all the replies lies in the use of the word "cheeks" and "jaw" to describe what I see going on with the canvasback head posted for feedback. Look at the following picture:
View attachment FrondWidgeon 003 (600 x 489).jpg
Now, do you see what will happen to the line of the "cheek" musculature carved into that bird as the decoy is rotated and viewed head-on? There will be no line from the "cheek/jaw" to interrupt the flow of the neck-line when the decoy is viewed head -on. The "cheek" muscle I carved into that particular bird will disappear because it is well forward of the jowl area which flows down uninterrupted at the neck. Hope this helps clarify what I'm talking about when I said:
"Any rounding of the "jaw" area is forward of the neck and it pretty much disappears when the head is viewed head-on."
Now go back and look at the pictures originally posted by Nick. See what I mean? A common mistake of beginning carvers is to "see" this line at the cheek/jaw/chin (pick the term) as extending all the way back around the neck - into and even past the jowl. When this interpretation is viewed head on, it shows up as a harsh channnel in the flow of the neck line (Looks like a pumpkin on a stick). That shouldn't happen. Additionally, the species in the picture posted for comments is a canvasback - probably the one duck that would be the prime example of how the neck flows down uninterrupted at the jowl. If you don't care about having that line, it's ok by me . Treat this as you would advice you ask from your in-laws: Listen to it, and then do whatever you like.
If it's still not clear, we can ask Hitch to post a pic of a head on shot of that widgeon decoy ( I wish I had one in my files, but this is the best angle shot I can come up with).
Paulie,
I applaud your love of carving, and I think what you're doing to pass on the tradition & enjoyment to others is great. Just pullin' your chain. Heck, I
know Harker gave you more grief than that, just 15 seconds into a phone call.
-----Oh, by the way, I don't want to see these pictures reproduced on any other forums; they're for personal, one time, use only... I don't want you guys taking advantage of me to make
billions of dollars on reproductions. Please respect that and be gentle with me...
(That was a Joke, a JOKE , A
JOKE... insert hundreds of 'smilies' ... funnin', satire, joke!)
View attachment FrondWidgeon 003 (600 x 489).jpg