Todd Duncan Tennyson
Well-known member
Maybe the ducks overheard that the WMA was closed mid week so they kept on flying.
Eric Patterson said:Todd & others
Like I mentioned above I like the idea, but REALLY like the way they are going about it. That being a pilot study with data collected to assess the impact on harvest. That aspect really appeals to me. Experimentation, data collection and analysis, inference, and finally decisions based on real-world information. I'd call that good science and the best managers can do. Far better than conjecture and opinion!
I've seen policies implemented on manager hunches and hunter cries and not hard data and it sucks when you doubt their decision was a good one and denies opportunity. That happened on our local WMA where hunting was shut down during mid-week. A comprehensive study was done after the fact by an Auburn grad student in conjunction with the state using data collected with drones over several years. They counted ducks on the WMAs and refuges and gathered a large amount of data. Final analysis showed there was no increase in waterfowl activity on the WMAs during the no-hunting days. I sure would have liked a pilot run on this no mid-week policy before it became a regulation that eliminated hunting opportunity and forced hunting on crowded weekends with no benefit to waterfowl.
Eric
SJ Fairbank said:ded weekends with no benefit to waterfowl.
Eric
I am joking, but Maine's Sunday hunting ban has probably kept me from getting divorced. If I could hunt 2 days every weekend I would be in big trouble.
We see several bills every year to allow Sunday hunting, and they never go anywhere. The state's large landowners are firmly opposed and lobby the hell out of every bill to allow Sunday hunting. Lodges and guides build their schedules around 1 week trips with Sunday as the turnover day.
Carl said:I'll play devils advocate.
Were any of us experts at identifying ducks on the wing when we first started?
Did we all have a skilled mentor to help and teach us the skills we have now?
Did none of us make mistakes during the first few years? Or even now?
If giving new hunters a couple of years to learn the ropes, with reduced bag limits, brings new blood into the sport, I don't see the harm. But don't let anyone who's completed a HIP survey for ducks more than twice qualify. And make it clear it's a short term, "probationary" deal. Make them take a ID class too.
I don't see it as a participation trophy. They are still going to need to learn the skills all of us learned over our lifetimes if they are going to continue.
And if this is not a good solution, what is???