Wee need to know why this is bing sprayed on us.

Wow, I didn't have a clue about the chem-trails. Time to dig further and watch the entire video.
Thanks much Todd,
Lou
 
Thanks for looking into it Lou.

I am not trying to be a "Fear monger".

I think it is odd that the Parts per Billion are tens of thousands of times higher for Aluminum Oxide, and many thousands of times higher for Barium and Strontium than they have been historically.

These people in the video are not hacks, they have PHDs and hold high positions.

This is the only planet we have, and we need to know why there is a global operation to spread toxins on it.
 
Last edited:
I just knew from the title that I shouldn't have looked at this post.

Ok first military chaff is not microscopic, it wouldn't work right on radar if it were so that part of it is just silly to even be in the video. They are light very short strands.

Long lasting contrails have been around since planes started flying over 20,000 feet. I watch a lot of old movies and I've even seen them in westerns from the 50s and 60s. Nothing new there just more planes flying now days. There are also countless photos and movies of long lasting contrails during WWII. It all depends on atmospheric conditions if the dissipate right away or stick around for hours. Open and shut case as the idiot in the video said they never use to be like that said. Amazing that he says they see most of them over western countries so they must all be in on it. Umm... maybe it is because a whole heck of a lot more planes fly over those countries. Since that part can be proven not true then all of it should have serious doubt cast upon it.

The rest is just scientific theory that sounds cool but is not nearly as practical as some scientists like to make it sound. Things like cloud seeding and diverting hurricanes was tried 50 years ago with some but very little usable success, none of that is hidden. History Channel has run shows about it many times.

It also keeps people from seeing the real dangers in the world. Hype does not mean there are any facts. For many years hard facts were used to dispel the global warming hoax but because of hype it persisted until a red hot smoking gun was finally unearthed right under the medias nose. Movie hype made a majority of people believe JFK was killed by someone other then Lee Harvey in the 90s. People who lived through it and saw ALL THE REAL FACT in the 60s overwhelmingly KNEW Oswald was the lone killer. Most people still don't know that Oliver Stone made up many of the things in the movie that are needed to make the conspiracy work.

For all of this to be true you would have to believe Obama wants to stop "global warming" without resorting to massive taxes on energy. What in his first two years of being in office points to that?

Tim
 
The only thought on my mind as I watched this "piece" was if Maxine Waters (or any other politician for that matter) could really spell aluminum.

Our current administration is so incompetent, I have to doubt an "organized" effort to thwart the dangers of global warming.

Best,
Steve
 
Tim,

#1 JFK was killed by the illuminati/ cia operatives because he wanted to keep the gold standard for our currency. The Banksters killed him because if we had a gold standard, they could not have the control over it like they have today with our worthless paper money.



#2. Long lasting chemtrails (if caused by atmospheric conditions) would not result in 10,000 x the aluminum dioxide and many thousands of times the Barium and strontium levels in the downwind locales.


#3 weather modification / cloud seeding has been used since before viet nam. It was employed heavily in Viet nam to wash out bridges and flood roadways to better our battle stances.


The history channel is run by multi media.(It is make believe) "like the boogey man"

You have been programmed by them (G.E.) and mass media to believe what you see may be real.

Why do you think it is called "Programming"

This is not hype either. The measurements made were made by professionals in their field, and well documented and supported by many others that hold a true education in the interpretation of the information being recorded.


No disrespect intended to you, but we are passing from an age of information that was force fed to us by the folks in control of the money, to an age where we can obtain information from the folks that have the tools and ability to "get it out"
Granted, there is garbage out there too, but the information provided previously is not from a couple of people that are wearing tin foil hats.
 
"You have been programmed by them (G.E.) and mass media to believe what you see may be real."
HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You know not what you talk about. I don't trust anyone so I look with my eyes not theirs.

"Long lasting chemtrails (if caused by atmospheric conditions)"
There is no "if" that CONTRAILS can be long lasting and if you have not found that then you are not looking for your own facts but taking for granted that "PHDs" and "big wigs" wouldn't lie. Many of them will lie to make money and you should never forget that. They need money just like the rest of us and there are people in all walks of life that will try to scare and cheat you out of it.

Since I can prove for a 100% FACT that they have been around since WWII then you prove for a 100% FACT that they have what you say is in them and it is not from other sources.
http://contrailscience.com/contrail-photos-through-history/ Most of the pictures come from books published well before any of this stuff was a thought. I wonder what G E Griffin was watching because he sure wasn't looking at the sky. Make me wonder how observant he is with everything else he has done.
Here are some more just because I can find them at will and the dates are well documented in books published before any photoshoping would have been thought of.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fighter_plane_contrails_in_the_sky.jpg
http://contrailscience.com/fightercontrails-over-kent-1941/
http://www.esowatch.com/en/index.php?title=File:Contrail1.jpg

There are many WWII era movies that used real footage from the war that also show them.
Don't even try to tell me that they have been added to the old movies that I have been fanaticly watching for the last 25 years. I have seen that claim and can you imagine how many people would have to be in on it? There would be no secret.

So why if one part of their argument has been proven 100% false should anyone believe they are telling the truth about anything else? That is drinking the koolade and not looking for yourself. I sir am skeptical of everyone and just because I used History Channel does not mean I blindly believe everything they have on.

I don't doubt at times a lot of elements are found in larger then normal amounts. We have ground, blasted and blown up stuff we shouldn't have for the past 70 years. Most of it is not secret anymore.

If you believe what you do about JFK then there is little hope (no disrespect meant) and I'll stay away from these types of posts from you. Still enjoy your photos and writings about other things.

Tim
 
Seriously, this cant be posted here!- Why don't you start this off even better and even more well stated : Wii (the game) vs. Wee need to know what Bing (yes that search engine) is spreading on us.
Good lord I would rather jump on here and read a "yarn about truck tires clawing out of the driveway to some mythical valhala with a hound" than this junk.
This site get so deteriorated by this kind of stuff, some many of us frequent the site less and less from crap like this. There are millions of other places on the web for this stuff.
 
foilfez.jpg

I'm protected and you can be too - http://zapatopi.net/afdb/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Todd, this isn't something that I've heard about and isn't being talked about in mainstream science circles.
 
This kind of conspriracy shit really cracks me up.
Come on, like others have noted, there have been long lasting contrails in the sky since B-17s & B-24s flew deep missions over Germany in WWII.
 
Duckboats,ducks,guns, decoys...fun stuff, not science here take it somewhere else. That's why this site rules because we try not to discuss stuff that belongs on another blog. I miss Dave Clark's posts please come back!!!!


Greg E
 
Last edited:
I agree !! Where is this going. Unless it involves how to camouflage the aluminum foil that is wrapped around the guys head I am at a loss as to why it is here. Just my two cents
 
Yeeesh…Todd is taking a real beating here…

I’m not a fan of this topic, and that’s why I didn’t view the video, it just doesn’t interest me. But man, seems like for a guy who is a regular contributor and takes the time to write up his adventures (ducks, upland and otherwise) and post up all the pictures, that this is getting blown out of proportion. Not saying that all the responses have been blown-out, but do we really need any more to pile on and tell him to take it elsewhere?

Ryan
 
Ryan

Upon further consideration - you are correct - I withdraw my piling on............. the thread just rubbed me wrong - I should have moved on...........

I did get a laugh from Chris ..............
 
Last edited:
I dont buy into to many of the worry your self to death stuff I cant control in my little part of the world. But I sure as heck dont mind if a guy like Todd has a topic once in a while that is not on the daily top three duck hunting ideas for the week.

I can say this. He is one of the precious few regulars who post great writing and pictures to go with it, about a part of the country I likely wont get to spend much time in. And if a bunch of guys jump him because they dont like his take on something I sure hope they all are willing to pull their weight in the photo essay department.

Todd, old Alex wasn't a quitter and you should not be one either. If a few folks rubbed you the wrong way, shake it off and get back up. Keep sight of the things you can change and keep on keeping on with the dogs, duck bomber and the bike. Strap on that revolver and keep on ridding. Life is too short to spend your days having to keep from living it to the fullest.

Bob
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top